Leinster fans are somewhat conflicted after their side’s ho-hum victory over Castres at the RDS on saturday. The good news is that they are two from two after a tricky pair of opening games. If they come out the right side of the head-to-head with Northampton they should be in the box seat as far as qualification is concerned.
Churlish though it may appear to be whingeing after back-to-back wins, there is some cause for concern, not least that Leinster have so far played a somewhat reductive brand of rugby. Without wanting to come over too Leinsterlion – sorry Leinsterlion – Leinster fans have grown used to seeing their team play with a certain panache. Even when they were a bunch of second raters in Munster’s shadow they could still turn on the style with reasonable regularity. It’s not a csae of wanting to see style-for-style’s-sake, but rather that it is the approach that best suits the team.
In the aftermath of the Ospreys match nobody noticed much, and those who noticed didn’t mind. Away games in Europe, even against less than brilliant teams, are hard, and any sort of a win counts as a good day at the office. Besides, even Joe Schmidt’s heralded purveyors of the all-court-game generally saved the glam for the RDS and were happy to tough it out on the road. There wasn’t much flair in evidence when Leinster won by seven points in Glasgow, or when they were held tryless but kicked their way to a hard-fought win in Bath.
But in the return home matches they were rampant, setting a tempo their opponents couldn’t handle and racking up multiple tries in the process. And therein lies the rub. Having got the show on the road by beating Ospreys, most expected Leinster to dial up the pace a couple of notches and try to run the legs off a Castres side that, although champions of France and worthy of respect because of that, have never shown the greatest inclination to bring their A-game to away Heineken Cup matches.
Instead Leinster played conservatively, kicking much ball away, and rarely looked to put much width on the ball. There’s nothing wrong with winning ugly per se, but is grinding it out really their best suit? Midway through the second half it was looking like Leinster’s approach was landing them in a spot of bother. Had Remi Tales not butchered a crossfield grubber when there were players queuing up to score a try, Castres would have moved in front on the scoreboard and put Leinster in a deeply uncomfortable spot. French sides can lose interest in away matches for sure, but they can also become interested if they sense a famous result is in the offing, and had Castres taken a lead at that point, their determination levels would have gone up a notch.
Much of the consternation inevitably revolves around the selection at fly-half, where Matt O’Connor has made it clear his preference is for the more controlling 10, Jimmy Gopperth. Again, the home-away conundrum is at play. Many fans assumed that while Gopperth was the man for the Ospreys game, Ian Madigan would be the appropriate selection to take on Castres. But those fans have been living on a diet of Joe Schmidt selections for three seasons. Schmidt habitually picked a different team for home games to away matches, usually emphasising tempo at home (Reddan, Jennings) and beefing up the set piece for away matches (McLaughlin, van der Merwe), but there are no guarantees O’Connor will see things the same way. It looks for the moment that Gopperth is first choice. He’s a fine player, no question, but his strengths are his kicking game and his ability to run with the ball on occasion. He’s not really a distributor who will bring the best out the backline around him. Most concerning of all was that when the game was crying out for Madigan, he was almost the last reserve to be let on to the pitch; and when he did come on it was at 12, not 10.
No doubt there’s an element of bias in favour of Madigan on the terraces. Fans naturally favour their home-grown players over foreign signings, it’s only human. But there is a growing feeling that Matt O’Connor doesn’t really rate, or trust, Madigan. Why only let him on so late in the game? Perhaps the expensive yellow card against Munster has got up his coach’s nose and he has to serve a spell in pergutory.
Leinster’s next two games in the Heineken Cup will be far harder than their first two. Northampton are still short of being a great team, but they can raise their game to a high level, and the Courtney Lawes Hype Machine is starting to crank up again after three years in mothballs. If Leinster stick to their tactic of kicking too much ball away, and kicking it too long and not chasing hard enough, they will be made to look foolish against a team with Ben Foden and George North in the back three.
The optimistic scenario is that Leinster are still operating with a patched-up backline and once O’Driscoll and Fitzgerald – who looked very threatening when he came on – are fully restored to the team that there will be more emphasis on attack and putting the ball through the hands. In the meantime, O’Connor has tightened up a defence that was more than a little creaky last season, and that focus will begin to shift to attacking and Leinster’s fabled gainline-passing. One hopes Ian Madigan will be trusted to do some of the playmaking – after all, he’s awfully good at it when given the chance.

